An Analysis of Matt Ridley’s The Origins of Virtue :: Philosophy Essays

An Analysis of two-dimensional Ridleys The Origins of merit Inwardly examining his give nature, world would prefer to call in himself as a virtuously resolute being designed in the image of a divine occult force. Not to say that the genuine nature of homosexual is a bed beast, he does posses, like umpteen other creatures admirable traits. As motive Matt Ridley examines the nature of serviceman in his work The Origins of Virtue, both the self-centered and altruistic sides of man argon explored. Upon making an honest and accurate sagaciousness of his character, it seems evident that man is not such a creature divinely set apart from the harness of selfishness and immorality. Rather than put man at either extreme it seems more(prenominal) accurate to describe man as a creature whose aim is to look out for himself first, as a means of survival. It is accredited that on m both levels humans act in a joint manner to benefit all-- but does that warrant a claim tha t man is genetically altruistic? Perhaps the reasoning stool his actions would lead to another view. As Ridley examines mans dependency upon others in his species, it becomes apparent that man is not necessarily a savage beast out to do everyone in, but rather a lone creature trying to get word his survival. In comparing man as the lone hunter to the reconciling being he is like a shot it is evident that his species has thrived and carry throughd with much greater allay in a cooperative society as opposed to a lone hunter. Though it provoke be easily argued that this cooperation between man, is at some level a sort of mutual altruism, it may offend be understood as a selfish means of survival. The byword goes that there is safety in numbers, this could not be more veritable for mans plight. Because alone man stands undersized chance of perpetuating his genes, he flocks to the community where he has the better chance of survival, as do his genes. So to better get a li ne the reasoning behind mans urgency to be in the community it is exacting to look at nature. In the wild and brutal game of lifetime the only pulsation of true success is whether genes are passed on. Like any other animal this measure of success measures mans success too. For all creatures, to survive is the chance at chronic a gene line, and it is this necessity to hatch the line that is innately imbedded in man and all other creatures.An Analysis of Matt Ridleys The Origins of Virtue Philosophy EssaysAn Analysis of Matt Ridleys The Origins of Virtue Inwardly examining his own nature, man would prefer to see himself as a virtuously courageous being designed in the image of a divine supernatural force. Not to say that the true nature of man is a complete beast, he does posses, like many other creatures admirable traits. As author Matt Ridley examines the nature of man in his work The Origins of Virtue, both the selfish and altruistic sides of man are explored. Upon makin g an honest and accurate assessment of his character, it seems evident that man is not such a creature divinely set apart from the trappings of selfishness and immorality. Rather than put man at either extreme it seems more accurate to describe man as a creature whose tendency is to look out for himself first, as a means of survival. It is true that on many levels humans act in a cooperative way to benefit all-- but does that warrant a claim that man is genetically altruistic? Perhaps the reasoning behind his actions would lead to another view. As Ridley examines mans dependency upon others in his species, it becomes apparent that man is not necessarily a savage beast out to do everyone in, but rather a lone creature trying to ensure his survival. In comparing man as the lone hunter to the cooperative being he is today it is evident that his species has thrived and survived with much greater ease in a cooperative society as opposed to a lone hunter. Though it can be easily argued that this cooperation between man, is at some level a sort of mutual altruism, it may better be understood as a selfish means of survival. The saying goes that there is safety in numbers, this could not be more true for mans plight. Because alone man stands little chance of perpetuating his genes, he flocks to the community where he has the better chance of survival, as do his genes. So to better understand the reasoning behind mans need to be in the community it is imperative to look at nature. In the wild and brutal game of life the only measure of true success is whether genes are passed on. Like any other animal this measure of success measures mans success too. For all creatures, to survive is the chance at continuing a gene line, and it is this necessity to continue the line that is innately imbedded in man and all other creatures.